Research Catalog

Assessment of surface ship maintenance requirements / Robert W. Button, Bradley Martin, Jerry M. Sollinger, Abraham Tidwell.

Title
  1. Assessment of surface ship maintenance requirements / Robert W. Button, Bradley Martin, Jerry M. Sollinger, Abraham Tidwell.
Published by
  1. Santa Monica, Calif. : RAND Corporation, [2015]
Author
  1. Button, Robert

Items in the library and off-site

Filter by

Displaying 1 item

StatusFormatAccessCall numberItem location
Status
Request for on-site useRequest scan
How do I pick up this item and when will it be ready?
FormatBook/TextAccessRequest in advanceCall numberV810 .B88 2015Item locationOff-site

Details

Additional authors
  1. Martin, Bradley Dean
  2. Sollinger, Jerry M.
  3. Tidwell, Abraham
  4. National Defense Research Institute (U.S.) sponsoring body.
Description
  1. xviii, 57 pages; 28 cm
Summary
  1. The Department of Defense is likely to face years of declining resources as the U.S. government grapples with fiscal challenges. These challenges affect every account, including those associated with surface ship maintenance and operations. At the same time, there has been widespread concern that surface ship materiel readiness is declining due to a high pace of operations and a sense that there have been many instances of deferred maintenance. The need to balance fiscal reality and a continued need for ready ships is likely to be an ongoing challenge. At the request of the Assessment Division of the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, this report: (1) determines the impact on long-term fleet readiness, Operational Availability (Ao), and Expected Service Life (ESL) caused by near-term reductions in Operations and Maintenance (O&M) accounts; (2) recommends potential strategies to minimize negative impacts to Ao and ESL and maintain the largest, most capable fleet possible; (3) develops a maintenance requirement concept, per ship class, that supports ESL, but allows for some risk within the maintenance strategy; and (4) defines the risks to Ao and ESL resulting from the new requirement. The methodology could be applicable to multiple ship classes.
Subject
  1. United States > Navy > Appropriations and expenditures > Evaluation
  2. Warships > United States > Maintenance and repair
Owning institution
  1. Harvard Library
Note
  1. "RAND National Defense Research Institute."
  2. "Prepared for the United States Navy."
  3. "RR-1155-NAVY"--Cover page 4.
Bibliography (note)
  1. Includes bibliographical references (page 57).
Processing action (note)
  1. committed to retain