Click to search the Andrew Heiskell Braille and Talking Book Library Skip Navigation

24 Frames per Second

Reel Books: The Social Network


The Social Network, starring Jesse Eisenberg (Zombieland), arrived in theaters on October 1st. You knew it was based on the true story of the Facebook founders, but did you know that it was based on a book? The book is called The Accidental Billionaires: The Founding of Facebook, A Tale of Sex, Money, Genius, and Betrayal written by Ben Mezrich (the author of another "Reel Book," Bringing Down the House: The Inside Story of Six M.I.T. Students Who Took Vegas for Millions, made into the film 21 starring Kevin Spacey).

I decided to read The Accidental Billionaires for this blog in particular. I noticed the book a couple of times in the library but it didn't spark any interest. That soon changed.

The first thing I thought about the book was that it was filled with a lot of descriptions. It was like being given a tour of the Harvard University campus. The author described everything from the weather, the buildings, and the students to the wooden furniture. The amount of details in my opinion was unnecessary. But the details did help to set the tone for the type of characters and situations that would soon follow. The world being described was a new world to me and it took some getting used to. As an alumna of CUNY in New York City, it was almost annoying and uncomfortable reading about such an elite Ivy League environment but this did serve a purpose. The feeling of awkwardness allowed me to understand the social awkwardness of Mark Zuckerberg and gave a convincing sense of why he kept to himself and his thoughts a lot of the time.

Another thing that took some getting used to was that the book is written from an outsider’s perspective. After seeing the trailers for the film, I almost forgot that the book Accidental Billionaires is indeed a biography of Eduardo Saverin, the co-founder of Facebook. However, it's written more like a documentary. Whenever there's a time the author is not completely sure of details, he sets up a scene yet lets it be known that it's based on his assumption of what may have taken place. I like the honesty of the author. The beginning was the hardest for me to get through, but once I forced myself to get past that, it got interesting: I almost missed my stop on the ride home. If you like Shakespearean plays, I'm pretty sure you'll like this book because it is filled with drama.

As for the movie, I was glad I saw it. Jesse Eisenberg (Mark) did a great job in stepping away from his previous roles as a sweet kid in Zombieland and Adventureland and played a convincingly clever and witty genius. The book mentions how his character speaks almost like the calculated programming codes he writes and Jesse did a wonderful job conveying this almost robotic characteristic. The rest of the cast did great as well especially Andrew Garfield (Eduardo) and singer Justin Timberlake (Sean Parker) who were just like the people in the book. Even when I saw the trailer, I immediately knew exactly who was playing who.

The Book vs. The Movie

In the movie the scenes cut back and forth from the past to the present while the book describes the events in chronological order, but they both work perfectly for each format.

The book had a touch of humor but the movie was pretty funny and got quite a few audible laughs from the audience.

The female presence in the book was practically nil. When there were females mentioned, it was usually in a disparaging way; the movie tempered the overwhelming amount of testosterone by introducing a couple of good, strong-minded females and even presented a flash of subtle romance. I'm assuming this was to be a more "lady friendly" film. A good tactic, I think. [This has turned into a controversial topic, and director Aaron Sorkin has responded.]

In the book, whether or not Mark stole the idea from the Winklevoss twins and Divya Narendra is not black and white; it actually leans toward the theory that he did not. The movie on the other hand implies that Mark did steal the idea and that it was obvious.

The film contained several dramatic moments of epiphanies and realizations the characters had that the book presented more like casual experiments. As in "Hmm… let me try this and see if it works… OK it does. Ta-da!" which makes sense, given that a movie needs explosive discoveries to keep the action moving forward.

In the movie, the twins had very distinctive personalities and they play on this but in the book they appear to operate as a single unit.

These are just a few of the differences I noticed between The Social Network and Accidental Billionaires.

The one scene I would have liked to have seen as written in the book is the "girlfriend goes psycho" scene. I thought it was hilarious in the book so it was sort of disappointing that it was not on the level of hilarity it could've been if this part had been kept as is.

My favorite lesson from the story: Don't drink and blog.

Did I like the book or the movie better? The book. 

If you saw the film, read the book, or both, let us know what you thought!


Patron-generated content represents the views and interpretations of the patron, not necessarily those of The New York Public Library. For more information see NYPL's Website Terms and Conditions.

The Accidental Billionaires

Excellent review. I truly like your objectivity on both (book and movie). You have left enough to the imagination of others who have not yet seen the movie and/or read the book, to want to do so. Kudos!!!

Thank you so much for your

Thank you so much for your comment!It is greatly appreciated.

Thank-you for your review. I

Thank-you for your review. I am now less concerned that reading the book will involve immersion in the attempts of certain persons to convince the world that M. Zuckerberg stole their idea. I am curious to see whether the book conforms to critical comments of the movie in portraying Harvard inaccurately as the old Waspy dominated domain it once was rather than it's current incarnation: significantly more open and diversified, if still elegant institution. At least that's the buzz.

Thank you,Reader,for your

Thank you,Reader,for your feedback. I am glad my review was helpful in putting your mind at ease in regards to reading the book.Do keep in mind that my review is indeed based on my personal take on the story.However,please be sure to update us on your thoughts if and when you do end up reading The Accidental Billionaires.Enjoy!

Thanks for the enlightening

Thanks for the enlightening review. I had no idea The Social Network was based on a book and very well may read it, especially since you liked it better. Loved the film.

Good Review

I saw the movie 2x in the theater and read the book immediately following the first viewing. The thing I liked the best about both is how well the situation was captured. The book was fast paced and entertaining, while not being too hard to follow. The movie referenced what I call the "nerd level" (higher computer skills than I could ever comprehend) but it never went so far into that level where the view was lost. All and all I loved both movie and book. Choosing one over the other is difficult but I would choose the book. I am currently reading Bringing Down the House and the style of writing is the same, good pace while keeping you engaged with understanding the details. Also paints the a great picture. I would definitely suggest checking it out.

Thank you so much,Kristine

Thank you so much,Kristine for your feedback. I completely agree with you as far as both the movie and the book capturing the situation well.And,I'll definitely try to take a look at Bringing Down the House. Perhaps i'll feature that and the film 21 which i've already seen and thought was pretty good.Thanks for the suggestion =).

Post new comment